Browse by Year
/ 2009
/ January
/ Thursday, January 08, 2009
[Federal Register: January 8, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 5)]
[Notices]
[Page 816-819]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08ja09-37]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2005-N-0464] (formerly Docket No. 2005N-0403)
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for
Industry on Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format--Drug
Establishment Registration and Drug Listing
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
February 9, 2009.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-6974, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0045.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information
Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Draft Guidance for Industry on Providing Regulatory Submissions in
Electronic Format--Drug Establishment Registration and Drug Listing;
Availability; Registration of Producers of Drugs and Listing of Drugs
in Commercial Distribution--(OMB Control Number 0910-0045--Amendment)
Description of Respondents: Respondents to this collection of
information are foreign and domestic owners and operators of
establishments that engage in the manufacture, preparation,
propagation, compounding, or processing (which includes, among other
things, repackaging and relabeling) of a drug or drugs\1\ and that are
not exempt under section 510(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) or subpart B of part 207 (21 CFR part 207) (registrants).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Means both human, including biological products, and animal
drugs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Reporting Burden
The draft guidance describes how to electronically create and
submit Structured Product Labeling (SPL) files using defined code sets
and codes for establishment registration and drug listing information
(including labeling). Most information is already required to be
submitted under section 510 of the act, section 351 of the Public
Health Service Act, and part 207.
Drug establishment registration and drug listing information and
updates to such information, required under part 207, and certain
additional recommended information are currently submitted in paper
form using Form FDA 2656 (Registration of Drug
[[Page 817]]
Establishment/Labeler Code Assignment), Form FDA 2657 (Drug Product
Listing), and Form FDA 2658 (Registered Establishments Report of
Private Label Distributors) (collectively referred to as FDA Forms; 72
FR 67733, November 30, 2007).
In addition to the information collected by the FDA Forms (72 FR
67733, November 30, 2007), the draft guidance addresses electronic
submission of other required information as follows:
For registered foreign drug establishments, the name,
address, and telephone number of its U.S. agent (Sec. 207.40(c));
The name of each importer that is known to the
establishment (the U.S. company or individual in the United States that
is an owner, consignee, or recipient of the foreign establishment's
drug that is imported into the United States. An importer does not
include the consumer or patient who ultimately purchases, receives, or
is administered the drug, unless the foreign establishment ships the
drug directly to the consumer or the patient) (section 510(i)(1)(A) of
the act); and
The name of each person who imports or offers for import
(the name of each agent, broker, or other entity, other than a carrier,
that the foreign drug establishment uses to facilitate the import of
their drug into the United States) (section 510(i)(1)(A) of the act).
FDA also is recommending the voluntary submission of the following
additional information, when applicable:
To facilitate correspondence between foreign
establishments and FDA, the e-mail address for the U.S. agent, and the
telephone number(s) and e-mail address for the importer and person who
imports or offers for import their drug;
A site-specific D-U-N-S[reg] Number\2\ for each entity
(e.g., the registrant, establishments, U.S. agent, importer);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ D&B[reg] D-U-N-S[reg] Number is a unique nine-digit sequence
recognized as the universal standard for identifying and keeping
track of over 100 million businesses worldwide. Submitting the site-
specific D-U-N-S[reg] Number for an entity would provide by
reference to the number certain business information for that
entity, e.g., address, parentage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The National Drug Code product code for the source drug
that is repacked or relabeled;
Distinctive characteristics of certain listed drugs, i.e.,
the flavor, the color, and image of the actual solid dosage form; and
Registrants may indicate that they view as confidential
the registrant's business relationship with an establishment, or an
inactive ingredient.
In addition to the collection of information, there is additional
burden for the following activities:
Preparing a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the
electronic submission of drug establishment registration and drug
listing information;
Creating the SPL file, including accessing and reviewing
the technical specifications and instructional documents provided by
FDA (accessible at http://www.fda.gov/oc/datacouncil/spl.html);
Reviewing and selecting appropriate terms and codes used
to create the SPL file (accessible at http://www.fda.gov/oc/
datacouncil/spl.html);
Obtaining the digital certificate used with FDA's
electronic submission gateway (ESG) and uploading the SPL file for
submission (accessible at http://www.fda.gov/esg/default.htm); and
Requests for waivers from the electronic submission
process as described in the draft guidance.
B. Burden Estimates
Reporting Burden--The estimates for the number of respondents,
annual frequency per response, and total annual responses indicated in
table 1 of this document are based on our current estimates of the
number of registrants and the number of submissions using the FDA Forms
(OMB Control No. 0910-0045). FDA estimates that it would take an
additional 2 hours per response (in addition to the estimated 2.5 hours
per response for registering, labeler code requests, listing, and
providing updates to the information approved under OMB Control No.
0910-0045) for the collection of information not currently submitted
using the FDA Forms, and to create and upload the SPL file. FDA
anticipates that the hours per response will decrease over time due to
the flexibility of submitting information for registering multiple
establishments or listing multiple drugs in one SPL file instead of
submitting individual FDA Forms, and increasing familiarity with the
use of the standards and code sets and codes for creating the SPL file.
In certain cases, if it is unreasonable to expect a person to
submit registration and listing information electronically, FDA may
grant a waiver from the electronic format requirement. Because
registrants will only need a computer and access to the Internet, FDA
envisions few instances in which electronic submission of registration
and listing information will not be reasonable for the person
requesting the waiver and, thus, is estimating that FDA would grant one
waiver annually. We estimate that a one-time burden for requesting a
waiver would be an hour of time for a mid-level manager to draft,
approve, and mail a letter.
Recordkeeping Burden--In table 2 of this document, FDA estimates
that 3,295 (39 + 3,256) respondents would expend a one-time burden of
approximately 40 hours in preparing, reviewing, and approving an SOP
for creating and uploading the SPL file; and an estimated 1 hour
annually to maintain the SOP as needed.
In the Federal Register of July 11, 2008 (73 FR 39964), FDA
published a notice of availability of the draft guidance document
providing a 60-day public comment period on the information collection
provisions. Nineteen comments were received of which four remarked on
the information collection. Thereafter, in the Federal Register of
October 23, 2008 (73 FR 63158), FDA published a 30-day notice
responding to the comments submitted on the proposed collection of
information and announced that the proposed collection of information
had been submitted to OMB. In response to a request by OMB, FDA is
republishing the 30-day notice responding to comments and announcing
the submission of the proposed collection of information to OMB.
(Comment 1) On the topic whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's functions,
including whether the information will have a practical utility, one
comment agreed that the proposed collection of information is necessary
for us to perform its functions and is consistent with the provisions
of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Public Law
110-85). The comment continued to say that the information is also
necessary to support the transition from paper format to electronic
format, and that the additional information requested by us is logical
and reasonable and is not an undue burden.
(Response) We appreciate the support and concurrence of the
comment.
(Comment 2) On the topic whether the accuracy of FDA's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used, one comment stated
that we underestimated the effort to prepare, review, approve,
implement and maintain internal SOPs for electronic submission of drug
establishment registration and drug listing information because of the
following reason. Particularly for most large companies, drug
establishment registration and drug listing information (currently
submitted in paper format under 21 CFR 207.22)
[[Page 818]]
and content of labeling (currently submitted in electronic format under
21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)) are handled by completely different functional
experts and/or departments in the companies. To coordinate these
processes, additional time is needed to define new procedures and
interactions that cross functional departments and possibly
international groups. Therefore, large companies will expend more than
40 hours to prepare, review, approve, implement and maintain SOPs.
Another comment asserts that the hours per response in table 1 are
underestimated if the estimate accounts for the time required to become
familiar with the Structured Product Labeling (SPL) standard.
(Response) In estimating hours per record in table 2 of this
document, we considered the various sizes of entities affected and
proposed an average number of hours per activity. For example, the
estimated 40 hours per record are based on smaller entities requiring
approximately 20 hours per record and larger entities requiring
approximately 60 hours per record. Therefore, because the comment did
not provide a revised estimate, we are maintaining an estimate of 40
hours per record, which is consistent with preparing SOPs for paper
format submissions and also includes coordination efforts.
Regarding the comment on underestimating the hours per response in
table 1, the software designed to create the SPL files, the step-by-
step instructions in the technical guides, and our technical assistance
email address are provided by us for the purpose of minimizing the need
to learn the SPL standard before submitting information electronically.
In this document, we are correcting an error in table 1 under the
hours per response column. Although the written description of the
burden added 2 hours to the existing 2.5 hours approved by OMB under
Control Number 0910-0045 (for a total of 4.5 hours), 4.5 hours was not
correctly reproduced in table 1. The total hours column is also
adjusted to reflect this correction.
(Comment 3) On the topic of ways to minimize the burden of the
collection on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information
technology, one comment encouraged us to continue the availability of
Xforms at no cost for industry to use as a software tool for the
creation of SPL. The comment also requested that we continue this
practice as technology evolves and provide support for this tool.
(Response) We appreciate the encouragement of the comment and will
consider the request to continue the practice and provide support as
technology evolves.
(Comment 4) Two comments did not agree with our statement that
there are no capital or operating and maintenance costs associated with
the collection of information. The comments explained that some
companies may choose alternative tools to the Xform software or work
with external conversion providers, which may involve the purchase and
maintenance of software plus the use of internal information technology
personnel for installation, configuration and maintenance. These
comments further stated that these costs are significant and need to be
considered in the overall cost for industry to comply with the
electronic submission requirement.
(Response) As the comments stated, companies may choose to use
alternative tools or work with external conversion providers. We do not
disagree. However, we have made every effort to eliminate costs to
industry to comply with the statutory requirement to electronically
submit drug establishment registration and drug listing information.
We also received comments that were specifically related to the
technical documents referenced in the draft guidance. Although these
comments are not directly related to the draft guidance document that
contains the information collection, we will consider the comments when
reviewing the technical documents for revision.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Frequency per Total Annual Hours per
Activity No. of Respondents Response Responses Response Total Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New registrations, 39 14.72 574 4.5 2,583
including new
labeler code
requests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual updates of 3,256 2.99 9,735 4.5 43,807.5
registration
information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New drug listings 1,567 6.57 10,295 4.5 46,327.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New listings for 146 10.06 1,469 4.5 6,610.5
private label
distributors
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
June and December 1,677 11.21 18,799 4.5 84,595.5
updates of all
drug listing
information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waiver requests 1 1 1 1 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total .................... .................... .................. ............... 183,924
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Table 2.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Frequency per Total Annual Hours per
Activity No. of Recordkeepers Recordkeeping Records Record Total Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-time 3,295 1 3,295 40 131,800
preparation of
SOP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 819]]
SOP maintenance 3,295 1 3,295 1 3,295
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total .................... .................... .................. ............... 135,095
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
C. Costs Associated With Electronic Submission
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs
associated with the transition from paper to electronic submissions. To
create an SPL file and submit it to FDA, a registrant would need the
following tools: A computer, appropriate software, access to the
Internet, knowledge of terminology and standards, and access to FDA's
ESG.
Registrants (and most individuals) have computers and Internet
access available for their use. If a business does not have an
available computer or access to the Internet, free use of computers and
Internet are usually available at public facilities, e.g., a community
library; or they may request a waiver from submitting the information
electronically. Software is necessary to create a ``document.'' The SPL
file or ``document'' may be created internally by a business with
experience with SPL, or a business may use a user-friendly software
(XForms)\3\ available at no cost for industry use. In addition to the
software, FDA also provides technical assistance, and other resources,
code sets and codes, and data standards regarding SPL files.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See http://www.fda.gov/oc/datacouncil/xforms.html.
\4\ See http://www.fda.gov/oc/datacouncil/spl.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once the SPL file is created, the registrant would upload the file
through the ESG. A digital certificate is needed to use the ESG. The
digital certificate binds together the owner's name and a pair of
electronic keys (a public key and a private key) that can be used to
encrypt and sign documents. However, a small fee of up to $20.00 is
charged for the digital certificate and the registrant may need to
renew the certificate not less than annually. FDA is not calculating
this small fee as cost of doing business because it is less than or
equal to the biannual courier costs the registrant incurs for paper
submissions.
Dated: December 22, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-108 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Browse by Year
/ 2009
/ January
/ Thursday, January 08, 2009
|
|