Browse by Year
/ 2009
/ January
/ Monday, January 12, 2009
[Federal Register: January 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 7)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1153-1155]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12ja09-10]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-1364; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-103-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require modifying the control power wiring of the
normal supply fan and the low flow sensor for the equipment cooling
system of the electronic flight instrument system (EFIS). This proposed
AD results from a report of loss of both the normal EFIS cooling supply
and the indication of EFIS cooling loss due to a single failure of the
battery bus, causing eventual power-down of the EFIS displays; the
standby attitude indication is also powered by this battery bus. We are
proposing this AD to prevent loss of all attitude indications from both
the standby indicator and EFIS displays, which could decrease the
ability of the flightcrew to maintain the safe flight and landing of
the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 26,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
[[Page 1154]]
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000,
extension 1, fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-
1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suk Jang, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6511; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1364;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-103-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received a report of loss of both the normal electronic flight
instrument system (EFIS) cooling supply and the indication of EFIS
cooling loss due to a single failure of the battery bus, causing
eventual power-down of the EFIS displays; the standby attitude
indication is also powered by this battery bus. A single failure of the
battery bus can cause loss of attitude indications from both the
standby attitude indicator and EFIS displays. An indication of battery
bus failure is not displayed on Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
airplanes. The battery bus energizes the standby horizon, the normal
supply fan for the equipment cooling system for the EFIS, and the
cooling air flow sensor. If the fan does not operate, the EFIS will
start to get hot, and when it gets too hot it will automatically stop
operation by first going to mono-chromatic, and then, after 60 minutes
or more, it will power-down. The supply fan off light will not
illuminate to indicate that the fan has failed because it is also
powered by the battery bus, which lost power. When this condition
occurs, the flightcrew could be left without any attitude indication.
Loss of all attitude indications from both the standby indicator and
EFIS displays could decrease the ability of the flightcrew to maintain
safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156,
Revision 2, dated December 11, 2008. The service bulletin describes
procedures for modifying the control power wiring of the normal supply
fan and the low flow sensor for the equipment cooling system of the
EFIS. The modification includes the following procedures:
Rerouting the wire for Group 1 airplanes identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, Revision 1, on which the
length of the wire in the W018 wire bundle at the P18 load control
center is adequate. If the length of the wire is inadequate, install
new wire.
Rerouting the wire for Group 2 airplanes identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, Revision 1, on which the
length of the wire in the W018 wire bundle at the P18 load control
center is adequate. If the length of the wire is inadequate, install
new wire.
Modifying wire bundle W044 between the P6 top disconnect
panel and the P6-1 panel for Group 3 airplanes identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, Revision 1.
Modifying wire bundle W036 between the P5 forward overhead
panel and the mid-center ceiling panel for Group 4 airplanes identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, Revision 1.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs. This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 263 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of U.S.-
Action/airplane group Work hours Average labor Parts Cost per registered Fleet cost
rate per hour product airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Groups 1 & 2 modification............................... 3 $80 0 $240 153 $36,720
Group 4 modification.................................... 2 80 0 160 113 18,080
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, there are no Group 3 airplanes on the U.S. Register.
However, if an affected airplane is imported and placed on the U.S.
Register in the future, the required actions would take about 5 work
hours, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of this AD for Group 3 airplanes to be
$400 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
[[Page 1155]]
section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator.
``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope
of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2008-1364; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-
103-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by February 26, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, Revision 2, dated
December 11, 2008.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of loss of both the normal
electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) cooling supply and the
indication of EFIS cooling loss due to a single failure of the
battery bus, causing eventual power-down of the EFIS displays; the
standby attitude indication is also powered by this battery bus. We
are issuing this AD to prevent loss of all attitude indications from
both the standby indicator and EFIS displays, which could decrease
the ability of the flightcrew to maintain the safe flight and
landing of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Modification
(f) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify
the control power wiring of the normal supply fan and the low flow
sensor for the equipment cooling system of the EFIS, by doing all
the applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, Revision 2, dated
December 11, 2008.
Credit for Actions Done Using Previous Service Information
(g)(1) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, Revision
1, dated October 23, 2007, are acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of this AD.
(2) For Groups 1 and 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, Revision 1, dated October 23, 2007:
Actions done before the effective date of this AD in accordance with
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1156, dated June 20, 2006, are
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding requirements of
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, ATTN: Suk Jang, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment
Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6511; fax (425) 917-6590;
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 18, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-314 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Browse by Year
/ 2009
/ January
/ Monday, January 12, 2009
|
|