Browse by Year
/ 2009
/ January
/ Monday, January 12, 2009
[Federal Register: January 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 7)]
[Notices]
[Page 1193-1194]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12ja09-50]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Public Hearing
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Education, National Assessment Governing
Board.
ACTION: Notice of Public Hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Assessment Governing Board is announcing a public
hearing on February 4, 2009 to obtain comment on policy options for
testing and reporting of Students with Disabilities (SD) and English
Language Learners (ELL) on the National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP).
Public and private parties and organizations are invited to present
written and/or oral testimony. The hearing will be held in the Great
Hall at the Charles Sumner School, 1201 17th Street, NW., Washington,
DC from 9:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. est.
This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a
forthcoming public hearing of the National Assessment Governing Board.
This notice also describes the functions of the Board. Notice of this
meeting is required under Section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act. This document is intended to notify members of the
general public of their opportunity to provide comment. Individuals who
will need special accommodations in order to attend the hearing (such
as interpreting services, assistive listening devices, materials in
alternative format) should notify Munira Mwalimu at 202-357-6938 or at
Munira.Mwalimu@ed.gov no later than January 28, 2009. We will attempt
to meet requests after this date, but cannot guarantee availability of
the requested accommodation. The meeting site is accessible to
individuals with disabilities.
DATES: February 4, 2009.
Location: Washington, DC Charles Sumner School, 1201 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20036.
Time: 9:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. est.
Background
Under Public Law 107-279, the National Assessment Governing Board
(NAGB) is responsible for determining the content and methodology of
the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The assessment is
required to provide a fair and accurate measurement of student academic
achievement through a random sampling process that produces
representative data for the nation, the states, and other participating
jurisdictions.
Despite changes in policy during the past decade, variations in
inclusion and accommodation rates continue for students with
disabilities and English language learners among states and urban
districts participating in the National Assessment. These differences--
both between jurisdictions and over time--continue to prompt concern
about the fairness and comparability of NAEP results.
The Governing Board has established an Ad Hoc Committee of Board
members to conduct a comprehensive examination of NAEP testing and
reporting of these two student groups. The Committee is considering a
range of possible options in formulating recommendations to better
assure that NAEP samples are fully representative and produce
comparable results. The Committee is also considering whether changes
are needed in NAEP reporting to alert the public to significant
variations that persist and the impact they may have on reported
results.
In carrying out its work the Ad Hoc Committee is to consult widely
with state and local officials and representatives of groups concerned
with the populations and issues involved. It intends to draw on persons
with strong research, policy, and practical backgrounds.
The policy options being considered are available under
supplementary information in this notice and on the Web site of the
Governing Board at www.nagb.org. Other related material on the
Governing Board and the National Assessment of Educational Progress may
be found at this Web site and at www.nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.
The Board is seeking comment from policymakers, teachers,
researchers, state and local school administrators, specialists in SD
and ELL students, parents of children in elementary and secondary
schools, representatives of interested organizations, and members of
the public. Representatives of the Governing Board will conduct the
hearing to receive testimony, and may ask clarifying questions or
respond to presentations. Oral presentations should not exceed ten
minutes. Testimony will become part of the public record.
All views will be considered by the Ad Committee and by the full
Board. It is anticipated that the Committee will make recommendations
to the Governing Board at the NAGB meetings in March and May 2009.
To register to present oral testimony on February 4, 2009 at the
Charles Sumner School in Washington, DC, please call Tessa Regis, of
the NAGB staff, at 202-357-7500 or send an e-mail to Tessa.Regis@ed.gov
by Friday, January 30, 2009. Written testimony should be sent by mail,
fax or e-mail for receipt in the Board office by February 6, 2009.
The Board will make an effort to hear testimony from all persons
who wish to address it at the hearing without prior registration.
Speakers are encouraged to bring written statements for distribution at
the hearing.
Testimony should be sent to: National Assessment Governing Board,
800 North Capitol Street, NW.--Suite 825, Washington, DC 20002, Attn:
Lawrence Feinberg, Fax: (202) 357-6945, E-mail: Larry.Feinberg@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lawrence Feinberg, National Assessment
Governing Board, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 825, Washington,
DC, 20002-4233, Telephone: (202) 357-6942.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Assessment Governing Board is
established under section 412 of the National Education Statistics Act
of 1994, as amended. The Board formulates policy guidelines for the
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The Board's
responsibilities include selecting subject areas to be assessed,
developing assessment specifications and frameworks, designing the
methodology of the assessment, developing appropriate student
achievement levels
[[Page 1194]]
for each grade and subject tested, developing standards and procedures
for interstate and national comparisons, developing guidelines for
reporting and disseminating results, and releasing initial NAEP results
to the public.
The policy options being considered by the Ad Hoc Committee are
presented below. They are not mutually exclusive. Some could go into
effect quickly while others would be for medium-term or long-range
implementation. NAEP is a representative-sample survey, designed to
produce valid, comparable data on the academic achievement of large
groups of students. It is prohibited by law from providing results for
individual children or schools. The options are being considered
because of concern that variations in exclusion and accommodation rates
may jeopardize the fairness and comparability of NAEP results.
The options on which public comment is sought are as follows:
(1) Retain current procedures--Testing conditions on NAEP for SD
and ELL students follow those on state tests with limited exceptions.
Accommodation and exclusion rates are posted in the appendix of NAEP
reports. No adjusted scores or cautionary flags.
(2) Adopt uniform national rules for accommodations and exclusions
(a) For Students with Disabilities--Determine testing conditions
according to the severity, category, and/or nature of disability or
based on brief screener exam.
(b) For English Language Learners--Determine whether to take NAEP
in English by English language proficiency screener. Provide NAEP in
Spanish if below cut-score.
(c) Provide incentive for schools to encourage testing of SD and
ELL students by scoring excluded students at the 5th percentile
nationwide instead of the current practice of exclusions not affecting
group average. Incentive may be needed to accept uniform rules because
student participation in NAEP is voluntary by law.
(3) Conduct targeted testing at ability level
(a) Offer to all students, using assessment booklets at different
levels of difficulty--low, medium, and high.
(b) Offer less difficult or ``accessible'' booklets to SD and ELL
only. Might be similar in concept to NCLB ``alternate assessments'' but
must be on NAEP scale.
Determine level by brief locator test or percentile score on state
assessment. Follow standard testing procedures.
(4) Adjust scores--Use full population estimates or variant to
adjust for exclusions. Present as principal means of reporting in NAEP
Report Cards, alternate presentation in appendix, or prominently
displayed on NAEP Web site.
(5) Add cautionary flags
(a) For exclusions, if 5 percent or more of sample is excluded from
NAEP testing, a cautionary flag would accompany a state's scores. This
would be similar to rule in the TIMSS and PIRLS international
assessments. Might also flag if exclusion rate changed more than 3
percentage points from prior assessment year.
(b) For accommodations, flag if 10 percent or more of sample is
tested under non-standard conditions OR accommodation rate changed more
than 5 percentage points from prior assessment year.
(c) Use ``reasonable'' target exclusion rates (rather than a
uniform rate) that vary by demography and testing practice of states.
Flag if actual rates exceed targets or change by a defined margin.
(6) Research validity of accommodations most widely-used on state
tests--Results may expand or reduce the list of accommodations
prohibited by NAEP because they alter a fundamental attribute of the
assessment, e.g. reading-aloud the reading assessment or allowing
calculators on all sections of math. Studies may include extended time
to help determine if time should be deemed fundamental.
(7) Offer a screener exam to determine whether students can
``meaningfully participate'' in the National Assessment without an
accommodation that is provided on state tests but is not permitted by
NAEP. Currently, these students are routinely excused from the National
Assessment.
(8) Change rules for IEPs to have NAEP considered separately from
state tests--Rules for preparing individualized education programs
(IEPs) for SD students may be altered by state action or revised by
federal regulation, guidance, or law. Separate consideration for
participating in NAEP from IEP for state tests because the National
Assessment is required to produce valid representative-sample group
results for the nation, states, and urban districts and may not provide
data or impose consequences on individual students and schools.
(9) Make minor changes in NAEP report language and placement of
information about exclusions and accommodations.
In addition to commenting on the options, members of the public are
also encouraged to present other relevant views and recommendations.
A detailed summary of the hearing that is informative to the public
and consistent with the policy of section 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) will be
available to the public within 14 days of the meeting. Records are kept
of all Board proceedings and are available for public inspection at the
U.S. Department of Education, National Assessment Governing Board,
Suite 825, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC, from
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
Electronic Access to This Document: You may view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister/
index.html To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF,
call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free at 1-888-293-
6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: January 6, 2009.
Mary Crovo,
Interim Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board, U.S.
Department of Education.
[FR Doc. E9-262 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
Browse by Year
/ 2009
/ January
/ Monday, January 12, 2009
|
|