Browse by Year
/ 2008
/ August
/ Thursday, August 21, 2008
[Federal Register: August 21, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 163)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 49307-49310]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21au08-1]
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
[[Page 49307]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 900
[Docket No. AMS-FV-08-0061; FV08-900-1 FR]
Amendment of General Regulations for Fruit, Vegetable and Nut
Marketing Agreements and Marketing Orders; Addition of Supplemental
Rules of Practice for Amendatory Formal Rulemaking Proceedings
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the general regulations for federal fruit,
vegetable and nut marketing agreements and marketing orders by
establishing supplemental rules of practice for amendatory formal
rulemaking proceedings in accordance with section 1504 of the Food,
Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Bill). The supplemental
rules of practice add procedures to the rulemaking process relating to
amendments to fruit, vegetable and nut marketing agreements and
marketing orders; authorize the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to
impose assessments on affected industries to supplement funds necessary
to improve or expedite an amendatory hearing process; and authorize the
use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend such agreements and
orders. Section 1504 of the 2008 Farm Bill also applies to amendments
of federal milk marketing agreements and orders. The supplemental rules
of practice for federal milk marketing agreements and orders are
addressed in a separate rulemaking document.
DATES: Effective Date: August 21, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Finn, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Kathy.Finn@USDA.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@USDA.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under the general
regulations for federal marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR part
900), effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937,
as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Act provides authority for federal marketing agreement and
order programs for various fruits, vegetables and nuts. Marketing
agreements and orders can contain provisions that: Maintain the high
quality of produce that is on the market; standardize packages and
containers; regulate the flow of product to market; establish reserve
pools for storable commodities; and authorize production research,
marketing research and development, and advertising.
Background
Currently, the provisions of 556 and 557 of Title 5 of the United
States Code (formal rulemaking; 5 U.S.C. 556-557) are followed for
initiating, as well as amending federal marketing agreements and
orders. Section 557 requires that the rulemaking proceeding, including
agency decisions, be conducted on the record.
Following the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556-557 and part 900 of the
general regulations, which includes the rules of practice for formal
rulemaking, a request for a hearing on the proposal to initiate or
amend an agreement or order is sent to the Administrator of the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). When an amendment is requested, a
request typically comes from a marketing agreement or order committee
or board and includes a statement regarding the degree of industry
support for the proposal and the conditions the program or amendment to
the program are intended to address. AMS reviews the request and
supporting documents, as well as any alternative proposals from
interested parties and, if appropriate, a notice of public hearing is
issued and published in the Federal Register.
A USDA Administrative Law Judge presides at a public hearing and a
record is compiled of the testimony of proponents, opponents, and other
interested persons. Proposed findings and conclusions, and written
arguments or briefs may be filed with USDA after the hearing.
A recommended decision is issued by AMS based on hearing evidence.
Persons are allowed to file exceptions to the recommended decision for
a set period of time.
After consideration of all exceptions to the recommended decision,
USDA prepares a Secretary's (final) decision. If the decision is made
to issue or amend a marketing order, a grower referendum to implement a
marketing order is held on the proposal. While producers are voting,
copies of a companion marketing agreement are sent to handlers for
their signature, when such an agreement exists. Through their
signatures on the agreement, handlers indicate their intention to abide
by the terms of the program. For a stand-alone marketing agreement, a
handler sign-up would be conducted in lieu of a producer referendum for
promulgation or amendment of a marketing agreement.
Under a proposed marketing order or an amendment to the order, if
at least two-thirds of the growers voting by number or by volume
approve the proposal, a marketing order or amendment is issued, which
is binding on handlers in the designated production area. For marketing
agreements, only the signatory handlers are bound by the terms of the
agreement.
This process typically takes 18 to 24 months to complete, depending
on the complexity of the proposal and the size of the industry, and is
applicable to both proposed programs and amendments to programs.
Marketing orders are locally administered by committees or boards
made up of growers and/or handlers, and often a member of the public.
Marketing agreements are locally
[[Page 49308]]
administered by a committee or board made up of signatories to the
marketing agreement. Committees and boards have regularly scheduled
meetings to discuss industry conditions that the agreement or order can
address, as well as to conduct administrative matters, such as
committee or board nominations, and development of budgets and
necessary assessments to administer the programs. Also, it is during
such regularly scheduled meetings that amendments to a marketing
agreement or order are considered. As discussed subsequently, it is at
this time a pre-hearing information session typically would be
conducted.
Section 608c(17) of the Act provides that the provisions for
promulgating a marketing agreement or order are also applicable to
amendments to agreements or orders. Industries regulated under
marketing agreements and orders may find the need to amend the
agreements or orders if changes in the market or marketing problems
experienced in the industries warrant such revision. In other
instances, amendments can also be made to clarify and update order
provisions.
When needed, the committees and boards can recommend marketing
agreement and order implementing regulations, such as seasonal
regulations to establish grade and size requirements or the
establishment of assessment rates. Regulations must be based on the
authority in the agreement or order. These regulations are implemented
through informal rulemaking procedures, as provided under Sec. 553 of
Title 5 of the United States Code (5 U.S.C. 553). This section of Title
5 provides for notice and comment rulemaking. It requires, in part,
that notices of proposed rulemaking be published in the Federal
Register, and that interested parties be provided an opportunity to
comment on the proposal. After consideration of the relevant matter
presented, a final rule is issued. Typically, informal rulemaking is
accomplished within 90 days.
There are currently 32 active fruit, vegetable and nut marketing
orders, many with companion marketing agreements. Presently, there are
no stand-alone marketing agreement programs.
The 2008 Farm Bill and Supplemental Rules of Practice To Amend
Marketing Agreements and Orders
Section 1504 of the 2008 Farm Bill (H.R. 6124, Pub. L. 110-246)
made changes to section 18c(17) of the Act, which, in turn, requires
the addition of supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR part 900. For
amendments to fruit, vegetable and nut marketing agreements and orders,
the supplemental rules of practice: add certain rulemaking procedures
for amending marketing agreements and orders; authorize USDA to impose
assessments on affected industries to supplement funds necessary to
improve or expedite the amendatory hearing process; and authorize the
use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C 553) to amend such agreements and
orders, when determined appropriate.
Sections 900.1 through 900.18 of the general regulations of part
900 set forth the rules of practice and procedure governing proceedings
to formulate marketing agreements and orders. As stated previously, the
Act provides that provisions for initiating marketing agreements and
orders are also applicable to amendments to agreements and orders. This
final rule amends part 900 by adding supplemental rules of practice
regarding amendments to fruit, vegetable and nut marketing agreements
and orders to conform to the 2008 Farm Bill. This rule will add new
sections 900.36 through 900.43.
A new Sec. 900.36 is added to include standard language to a new
subpart stating that words in the singular form will be deemed to
import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.
A new Sec. 900.37 is added to set forth that the definitions in
the Act and in Sec. 900.2 of this part apply to these supplemental
rules of practice.
Pre-Hearing Information Session
A new Sec. 900.38 is added to provide that a pre-hearing
information session may be held either before or after a submission to
amend an agreement or order is submitted to USDA. The 2008 Farm Bill
provides for the establishment of pre-hearing information session
specifications. Pre-hearing information sessions may be conducted when
an industry is considering amending a marketing agreement or order.
Such sessions are intended to assist in the conduct of the overall
amendatory formal rulemaking process. The sessions may be held by a
marketing agreement or order committee or board. A pre-hearing
information session may also be held by the Secretary. The sessions may
be held either prior or subsequent to a submission of a proposal under
Sec. 900.3 of this part.
Currently, fruit, vegetable and nut marketing order committees and
boards, with USDA representatives in attendance, conduct regularly
scheduled meetings to discuss changes and challenges facing the
industry and ways amendments to marketing orders can address those
issues. There are currently no stand-alone marketing agreement programs
under section 608b of the Act. The meetings are also conducted to
discuss administrative matters, such as annual budgets and necessary
assessments. When a committee or board considers amendments to a
marketing order, there is usually a subcommittee selected to consider
the benefit of any amendments. The subcommittee meets in a public forum
to formulate proposed amendments and presents such proposed amendments
to the full committee or board. The full committee or board votes on
whether to pursue amendment of the order, also in a forum open to the
public.
Further, any proposals received by entities not directly associated
with a committee or board may be referred by the Secretary to the
applicable committee or board for their consideration.
Proposal Submission Requirements
A new Sec. 900.39 is added to specify submission requirements for
proposals to amend marketing agreements and orders. Currently, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS requests that any proposal to initiate a
new marketing agreement or order or to amend a marketing agreement or
order include detailed explanations of: the purpose of the proposal;
the problem the proposal is designed to address; the current
requirements or industry practices relative to the proposal; the
expected impacts on producers, handlers and consumers; how the proposal
would tend to improve returns to producers; the expected effects on
small businesses; whether the proposal would increase or decrease costs
to producers, handlers, committees and/or USDA; how the proposal would
be implemented; and how compliance would be effected with the proposal.
USDA has determined over time that a proposal that includes a
discussion of the above topics assists in the implementation of a new
marketing agreement or order and amendments to marketing agreements or
orders. To effectuate a new marketing agreement or order or an
amendment to an established agreement or order, USDA is required to
make a ruling on certain findings, conclusions or exceptions relating
to such proposals. The proposal submission requirement in the
supplemental rules of practice will assist industries in preparation of
their proposals for amendments to a current marketing agreement or
order.
[[Page 49309]]
Written Testimony and Data Request Requirements
A new Sec. 900.40 is added to provide requirements for written
testimony submitted as an exhibit at an amendatory fruit, vegetable or
nut rulemaking hearing and requirements for USDA data requests to be
used at such a hearing.
Currently, witnesses at hearings regarding proposed new or amended
marketing agreements or orders are not required to supply written
testimony prior to testifying. However, any documentation supplied
during the hearing must be submitted in quadruplicate when prepared as
an exhibit under current section 900.8(d)(4). Written testimony and
exhibits received prior to, or at the time of, the testimony are useful
for USDA participants whose role includes gathering sufficient
information to make a determination as to the merits of a proposal.
However, it is not always practical to have written testimony. For
example, a witness may want to testify on previous testimony by one or
more witnesses. This provision should not impede witness testimony in
this regard. In order to assist USDA participants, the new Sec. 900.40
requires that testimony prepared as an exhibit and any other exhibits
be made available to USDA on the day of appearance at the hearing, to
the extent practicable.
The 2008 Farm Bill provides that the supplemental rules of practice
establish requirements for requests for preparation of USDA data prior
to a hearing. Currently, in most hearings, USDA assembles appropriate
economic data and a USDA economist testifies to the sources and
relevance of the data. Rarely, if ever, has data been requested of USDA
from the industry prior to an amendatory hearing for fruit, vegetable
and nut marketing agreements and orders. However, in the event such
requests do occur, Sec. 900.40 sets forth that any request for
preparation of USDA data should be made at least 10 days before the
beginning of the hearing. This period of time is reasonable considering
the need to prepare such data.
Electronic Document Submission
A new Sec. 900.41 is added to allow for the submission of
electronic documents in proceedings to amend marketing agreements and
orders. The current rules of practice in part 900 require that four
copies of all documents related to proposed new and amended marketing
agreements and orders be filed with the hearing clerk. With new
technologies currently available, most documents in these proceedings
are also filed electronically with AMS. The 2008 Farm Bill requires
that electronic submission standards be established. Therefore, Sec.
900.41 sets forth that when possible, all documents filed with the
hearing clerk shall also be submitted electronically to the Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS and reference the docket number of the
proceeding. The provision sets forth that instructions for electronic
filing with AMS will be provided in each appropriate Federal Register
publication regarding the proceeding. This will simplify electronic
filing for all interested parties.
Industry Assessments
The 2008 Farm Bill provides for industry assessments. A new Sec.
900.42 is added to allow USDA to assess handlers for costs associated
with proceedings to amend fruit, vegetable and nut marketing agreements
and orders, if it is determined necessary to improve or expedite the
rulemaking proceeding. Currently, administrative costs associated with
formal rulemaking are paid for by AMS. These costs include hiring a
court reporter, a hearing examiner, legal counsel, and associated
travel costs. Some of these costs could increase if it was determined
necessary to improve or expedite the proceeding. For example, court
reporting costs could increase in order to receive the transcripts at
an earlier date than normal.
Section 900.42 states that if USDA determines it is necessary to
improve or expedite an amendment proceeding, USDA may impose an
assessment on a marketing agreement's or order's handlers affected by
an amendment proceeding to supplement funds for costs associated with
such, including, but not limited to, court reporters, hearing
examiners, legal counsel, hearing venue and associated travel for USDA
officials. The assessments would only be incurred by handlers regulated
by the program being amended.
Use of Informal Rulemaking
A new Sec. 900.43 is added to allow the use of informal rulemaking
procedures (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend fruit, vegetable and nut marketing
agreements and orders and to set forth parameters that USDA will
consider when determining whether this process is appropriate. Prior to
the 2008 Farm Bill, the Act required that all proposals to initiate a
new or amend a current marketing agreement or order were to be
conducted through formal rulemaking under Sec. Sec. 556 and 557 of
title 5 of the United States Code. However, the 2008 Farm Bill modified
the authority as to how amendments to marketing agreements and orders
can be conducted. It provides that authority under Sec. 553 of the
United States Code covering informal rulemaking procedures can be an
option for amending a fruit, vegetable and nut agreement or order.
Currently, informal rulemaking procedures are used to establish
implementing regulations authorized by marketing agreements and orders.
The timeframe for completion of informal rulemaking actions is usually
about 90 days, as opposed to formal rulemaking that, because of the
procedural requirements including holding a public hearing and grower
referenda, generally has a timeframe of 18 to 24 months.
In accordance with the 2008 Farm Bill, section 900.43 will allow
the option of using informal rulemaking to amend fruit, vegetable and
nut marketing agreements and orders. In considering whether informal
rulemaking will be used to amend a fruit, vegetable or nut marketing
agreement or order, USDA will consider: The nature and complexity of
the proposal; the potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected
entities; and any other relevant matters.
Final Action
In accordance with the 2008 Farm Bill, this final rule establishes
supplemental rules of practice regarding amendments to fruit, vegetable
and nut marketing agreements and orders.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Further, a small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable,
and nut marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://
www.ams.USDA.gov/AMSv1.0/
ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBus
inessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Subtitle F of Title I of the 2008 Farm Bill provides that the
promulgation of these regulations shall be made without regard to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Statement of Policy
of the Secretary of Agriculture, effective July 24, 1971 (36 FR 13804),
and the notice and comment provisions
[[Page 49310]]
of section 553 of Title 5, United States Code.
This rule relates to internal agency management. Therefore, this
rule is exempt from the provisions of Executive Orders 12866 and 12988,
and for this same reason the notice of proposed rulemaking and
opportunity for comment are also not required, as this rule may be
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
In addition, under 5 U.S.C. 804, this rule is not subject to
congressional review under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121). Finally, this rule is not a
rule as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)
(RFA). Therefore, this rule is exempt from the requirements of the RFA.
It is hereby found that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, will
tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 900
Administrative practice and procedures, Freedom of information,
Fruit, vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and orders, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 900 is amended as
follows:
PART 900--GENERAL REGULATIONS
0
Accordingly, in part 900, a new subpart is added to read as follows:
Subpart--Supplemental Rules of Practice Governing Proceedings To
Amend Fruit, Vegetable and Nut Marketing Agreements and Marketing
Orders
Sec.
900.36 Words in the singular form.
900.37 Definitions.
900.38 Pre-hearing information sessions.
900.39 Proposal submission requirements.
900.40 Written testimony and USDA data request requirements.
900.41 Electronic document submission standards.
900.42 Industry assessments.
900.43 Use of informal rulemaking.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 608c(17) and 610.
Sec. 900.36 Words in the singular form.
Words in this subpart in the singular form shall be deemed to
import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.
Sec. 900.37 Definitions.
As used in this subpart, the terms as defined in the Act and in
Sec. 900.2 of this part shall apply.
Sec. 900.38 Pre-hearing information sessions.
A pre-hearing information session concerning a proposal to amend a
fruit, vegetable or nut marketing agreement or order may be held either
prior or subsequent to submission of a proposal under Sec. 900.3 of
this part. Such sessions may be held by a marketing agreement or order
committee or board or by the Secretary.
Sec. 900.39 Proposal submission requirements.
When a person other than the Secretary makes a proposal to amend a
fruit, vegetable or nut marketing agreement or order under Sec. 900.3
of this part, the proposal shall address the following, to the extent
applicable:
(a) The purpose of the proposal;
(b) The problem the proposal is designed to address with
explanation and quantification;
(c) The current requirements or industry practices relative to the
proposal;
(d) The expected impact on the industry, including producers,
handlers, and on consumers;
(e) In the case of marketing orders, an explanation, including
supporting information and data, of how the proposal would tend to
improve returns to producers, and in the case of marketing agreements,
how the proposal impacts the signatories to the agreement;
(f) The expected effects on small businesses as defined by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612);
(g) A description and quantification of whether the proposal would
increase or decrease costs to producers, handlers, or others in the
marketing chain, and to consumers, marketing order committees and
boards and/or the Secretary;
(h) A description of how the proposal would be implemented; and
(i) A description, including quantification, of how compliance with
the proposal would be effected.
Sec. 900.40 Written testimony and USDA data request requirements.
In addition to the provisions of Sec. 900.8(b)(4), witnesses at an
amendatory fruit, vegetable or nut formal rulemaking hearing shall
make, to the extent practicable, at least 8 copies of their testimony,
if prepared as an exhibit, and any other exhibits available to USDA
before testimony is given on the day of appearance at the hearing.
Industry requests for preparation of USDA data for a rulemaking hearing
should be made at least 10 days prior to the beginning of the hearing.
Sec. 900.41 Electronic document submission standards.
To the extent practicable, all documents filed with the hearing
clerk in a proceeding to amend a fruit, vegetable or nut marketing
agreement or order shall also be submitted electronically to the
Agricultural Marketing Service, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, USDA. All
documents should reference the docket number of the proceeding.
Instructions for electronic filing shall be provided at the amendatory
formal rulemaking hearing and in each Federal Register publication
regarding the amendatory proceeding.
Sec. 900.42 Industry assessments.
If the Secretary determines it is necessary to improve or expedite
an amendatory fruit, vegetable or nut formal rulemaking proceeding,
costs associated with improving or expediting the proceeding may be
charged to the committees or boards. Such costs shall be paid with
assessments from the handlers regulated under the marketing order to be
amended or on signatories to the marketing agreement subject to
amendment. Such assessments may supplement funds for costs associated
with, but not limited to, court reporters, hearing examiners, legal
counsel, hearing venue and associated travel for USDA officials.
Sec. 900.43 Use of informal rulemaking.
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of Sec. Sec. 900.1 through
900.18, and 900.36 through 900.42 of this part, the Secretary may
determine that informal rulemaking procedures under Sec. 553 of Title
5, United States Code be used to amend fruit, vegetable or nut
marketing agreements and marketing orders. In making this
determination, consideration shall be given to:
(1) The nature and complexity of the proposal;
(2) The potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected
entities; and
(3) Any other relevant matters.
Dated: August 18, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8-19399 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
Browse by Year
/ 2008
/ August
/ Thursday, August 21, 2008
|
|