Browse by Year
/ 2008
/ November
/ Wednesday, November 19, 2008
[Federal Register: November 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 224)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 69593-69595]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19no08-29]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0341; FRL-8741-9]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern the permitting of
new or modified sources. We are proposing to approve local rules to
regulate these procedures under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to
follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by December 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2008-0341, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
E-mail: R9airpermits@epa.gov.
Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air-3), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region
IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents
in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of the rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
C. EPA Recommendation to Further Improve a Rule
D. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this proposal with the dates
that they were adopted by local air agency and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended or revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VCAPCD......................... 26 New Source Review-- 03/14/06, Amended........ 06/16/06
General.
VCAPCD......................... 26.1 New Source Review-- 11/14/06, Revised........ 05/08/07
Definitions.
VCAPCD......................... 26.2 New Source Review-- 03/14/06, Revised........ 06/16/06
Requirements.
VCAPCD......................... 26.3 New Source Review-- 03/14/06, Revised........ 06/16/06
Exemptions.
VCAPCD......................... 26.4 New Source Review-- 03/14/06, Revised........ 06/16/06
Emissions Banking.
VCAPCD......................... 26.5 New Source Review-- 03/14/06, Revised........ 06/16/06
Essential Public Service
Bank.
VCAPCD......................... 26.6 New Source Review-- 03/14/06, Revised........ 06/16/06
Calculations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 21, 2006, the rule submittal of June 16, 2006 was found to
meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, which
must be met before formal EPA review. On July 23, 2007, the rule
submittal of May 8, 2007 was found to meet the completeness criteria.
B. Are there other versions of the rules?
We approved a version of VCAPCD Rules 26 and 26.5 on December 7,
2000 (65 FR 76567). We approved a version of VCAPCD Rules 26.1, 26.2,
26.3, 26.4, and 26.6 on February 28, 2003 (68 FR 9561). We did not act
on a version of VCAPCD Rule 26.1, revised on March 14, 2006 and
submitted to us by CARB on June 16, 2006. While we can act on only the
most recently submitted version, we have reviewed materials provided
with the previous submittal.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
The purposes of revisions relative to the SIP rule are as follows:
VCAPCD Rule 26: A reference to the new Rule 26.11 is
added, along with the purposes of Rule 26.11, including (a) the process
by which the APCO determines if Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs) are
surplus at the time of use and (b) the implementation of an annual
[[Page 69594]]
equivalency demonstration program, are added to the rule.
VCAPCD Rule 26.1: Four definitions relating to bio-solids,
public service ERCs, and public service banking are added to the rule,
and the definition for Community Bank is removed from the rule.
VCAPCD Rule 26.2: The District name is added to the rule.
VCAPCD Rule 26.3: The exemption from offset requirements
for gasoline dispensing facilities that dispense into motor vehicles or
marine pleasure craft, is removed.
VCAPCD Rule 26.4.B.5: The banking of ERCs for gasoline
dispensing facilities that dispense into motor vehicles or marine
pleasure craft, shall be allowed for no more than the amount of ERCs
provided by the applicant after 10/22/91. Previously these ERCs were
not eligible for banking.
VCAPCD Rule 26.4.B.7: The provisions are added that (a)
after 10/22/91, any ROC or NOX emission increase calculated
pursuant to Rule 26.6.D but not offset with ERCs shall be ineligible
for banking and (b) an emission increase offset with a credit from the
Community Bank between 10/13/91 and 03/14/06 shall be ineligible for
banking.
VCAPCD Rule 26.4.F.2: The provisions are added that (a)
the District shall contact the owner of an ERC certificate annually to
determine if the owner will renew the certificate and (b) if not
renewed, the certificate will be deemed inactive and transferred to the
Essential Public Service Bank.
VCAPCD Rule 26.5: The title of this rule is changed from
``New Source Review--Community Service Bank'' to ``New Source Review--
Essential Public Service Bank.''
VCAPCD Rule 26.5.A: The applicability of this banking
section is changed to ``essential public service credits'' instead of
``community ERCs.''
VCAPCD Rule 26.5.C: The applicability of this disbursement
section is also changed to ``essential public service credits.'' Other
former community ERC transactions described in SIP Rule 25.5.C.2, such
as disbursing community ERCs to sources not required to provide offsets
on the date the Authority-to-Construct is issued, are deleted.
VCAPCD Rule 26.5.E: Requirements for tracking community
ERCs by the District are deleted from the rule. These provisions
already exist in the SIP-approved version of VCAPCD Rule 26.11.
VCAPCD Rule 26.6: The District name is added to the rule.
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
These rules describe administrative provisions and definitions that
support the review and permitting of new and modified emission sources
as required by Title I, subpart D, of the Clean Air Act for
nonattainment areas. In combination with the other requirements, these
rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the CAA) and must not
relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193).
EPA guidance and policy documents that we used to help evaluate
enforceability requirements consistently include the following:
Review of New Sources and Modifications, U.S. EPA, 40 CFR
part 51, subpart I.
Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies, EPA Region 9, (August 21, 2001). (The Little Bluebook)
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
We believe the rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability and SIP relaxations. The TSD has more
information on our evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendation To Further Improve a Rule
The TSD describes an additional revision to VCAPCD Rule 26.1 that
does not affect EPA's current action but is recommended for the next
time the local agency modifies the rule.
D. Proposed Action and Public Comment
Because EPA believes the submitted rules fulfill all relevant
requirements, we are proposing full approval as described in section
110(k)(3) of the CAA. We will accept comments from the public on this
proposal for the next 30 days. Unless we receive convincing new
information during the comment period, we intend to publish a final
approval action that will incorporate these rules into the federally
enforceable SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 69595]]
Dated: October 24, 2008.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E8-27484 Filed 11-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Browse by Year
/ 2008
/ November
/ Wednesday, November 19, 2008
|
|