Browse by Year
/ 2008
/ October
/ Tuesday, October 07, 2008
[Federal Register: October 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 195)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58473-58475]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07oc08-11]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0822]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Okeechobee Waterway, Mile 126.3,
Olga, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating regulations
governing the Wilson Pigott Bridge, Okeechobee Waterway mile 126.3,
Olga, Lee County, Florida. This action is necessary for worker safety
and will assist in expediting the repairs to this bridge. During the
period of this rule, the bridge will open a single-leaf on signal; a
double-leaf opening is available with a three-hour advance notice to
the bridge tender.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on October 7, 2008, to 6 p.m.
on February 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2008-0822 and are available online at http://
www.regulations.gov. This material is also available for inspection or
copying at two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays and the Commander
(dpb), Seventh Coast Guard District, 909 S.E. 1st Avenue, Room 432,
Miami, Florida 33131-3028 between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Mr. Michael Lieberum, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch, telephone number 305-415-6744. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary
final rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
(5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for
good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because publishing an NPRM was impracticable and contrary to the
public interest as the rule was needed to provide for worker safety and
will assist in expediting the repairs of the bridge.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Publishing an NPRM was
impracticable and contrary to the public interest, because the rule was
needed to provide for worker safety and will assist in expediting the
repairs of the bridge.
Background and Purpose
33 CFR 117.317 requires that the Wilson Pigott Bridge, mile 126.3
at Olga, shall open on signal; except that, from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. the
draw shall open on signal if at least three hours notice is given.
Due to the repairs of the Wilson Pigott Bridge, Okeechobee Waterway
mile 126.3 at Olga, Lee County, Florida, Coastal Marine Construction,
Inc. representing the owner of the bridge, has requested that the Coast
Guard change the current operation of the Wilson Pigott Bridge. This
resulting regulation is necessary for workers safety and will assist in
expediting repairs to the Wilson Pigott Bridge. During the duration of
this temporary rule, the bridge will be required to open only a single-
leaf on signal, rather than a double-leaf. A double-leaf opening will
be available, however, with a three-hour notice to the bridge tender.
In addition, sometime between September 5, 2008, and February 29, 2009,
the bridge will be closed to navigation for an eight-hour period; the
exact times and date of the bridge closure will be published in the
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. In cases of
emergency, the
[[Page 58474]]
bridge will be opened as soon as possible.
Discussion of Rule
During the period of this temporary rule, the draw of the Wilson
Pigott Bridge shall open only a single-leaf on signal. Leaving one leaf
in the closed position will significantly expedite repairs to the
bridge and increase worker safety as the workers will be able to work
on the closed leaf without interruption. Double-leaf operations shall
be available if a three-hour advance notice is provided to the bridge
tender. An eight-hour bridge closure will be required during the
repairs. The exact date and times will be published in the Local Notice
to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The draw shall open as
soon as possible for the passage of tugs with tows, public vessels of
the United States and vessels in a situation where a delay would
endanger life or property.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
The rule allows for bridge openings during the repairs to this
bridge and all closure times will be published with adequate time for
mariners to plan accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels needing to
transit the Okeechobee Waterway in the vicinity of the Wilson Pigott
Bridge, persons intending to drive over the bridge, and nearby business
owners. The revision to the openings schedule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Although
bridge openings will be restricted, vessel traffic will still be able
to transit the Okeechobee Waterway pursuant to the revised opening
schedule.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of
[[Page 58475]]
Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards
would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test
methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices)
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
under the Instruction that there are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 117.317(l) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.317 Okeechobee Waterway.
* * * * *
(l) Wilson Pigott Bridge, Olga, Florida. (1) The draw of the Wilson
Pigott Bridge in Olga will open a single-leaf on signal with a double-
leaf available with a three-hour notice to the bridge tender. In
addition, the bridge will be closed to navigation for an eight-hour
period; the exact times and date of the bridge closure will be
published in the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
(2) Effective Dates. This paragraph (l) is effective from 6 a.m. on
October 7, 2008, through 6 p.m. on February 28, 2009.
Dated: September 4, 2008.
R.S. Branham,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E8-23602 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Browse by Year
/ 2008
/ October
/ Tuesday, October 07, 2008
|
|